The devil in the door

De iban-oscuro-por-entre-las-sombras
Revisión del 02:33 26 mar 2021 de Elif (discusión | contribs.) (Página creada con «(rewrite) '''Proof of the Devil''' Probatio diabolica (or "devil's proof") is a legal requirement to achieve an impossible proof. When this state of affairs arises one s…»)
(difs.) ← Revisión anterior | Revisión actual (difs.) | Revisión siguiente → (difs.)
Ir a la navegación Ir a la búsqueda

(rewrite)

Proof of the Devil


Probatio diabolica (or "devil's proof") is a legal requirement to achieve an impossible proof. When this state of affairs arises one standard remedy is to shift the onus, the burden of proof. For example: while there may be substantive (but inconclusive) evidence to prove the devil's existence, there is no evidence that denies the devil's existence; therefore, one cannot deny the existence of the devil.

Two rooms connected by a door with a demon as usher: a famous thought experiment devised in 1867 by James Clerk Maxwell to hypothetically disprove the Second Law of Thermodynamics.

At the National University of Panama, in the department of mathematics there is a certain swing door that - on a frequent yet irregular basis – defies, frustrates, and rebukes both students and staff in the most highly rational academic disciplines. Put simply; its operational protocol remains as an impediment in the broader departmental mind and, as a consequence, can never effectively be committed to memory (a negligence that seemingly extends to even its most frequent user). And not in the least because this door is difficult to operate, it’s actually a quite regular hinged door (just the direction of swing is sometimes a little confusing!). It seems then the problem is more likely that the intelligence required to operate it is held in such little regard. In fact, it’s as if this knowledge were collectively, regularly (perhaps even wilfully) forgotten: possibly a case of cognitive oversight, or institutional amnesia, or simple lethargy. The door itself (truly a forgettable fixture) appears in the consciousness of the faculty only at the moment both make physical contact: (too late!) as if somehow this object were unable to enter history.

The first to identify this phenomenon was the founder of the department, José de Jesús Martínez (a.k.a. Chuchú). Being attuned to such things (he also noted its existence in a number of other situations in other localities) and, observing the unaccountably high frequency of its occurrence (he was also a bodyguard) he then resolved (curiously given he was atheist) to name the condition: Proof of the Devil.

Michael Stevenson was born in New Zealand in 1964. He lives and works in Berlin. He has become known for his large-scale installations yet his work also encompasses filmmaking, photography, printmaking, writing and publishing. His practice is based in research that more often begins with a historical event; via auxiliary objects these histories are converted and re-told in a form that assumes the exemplary. Underlying this process is simply the need to visualise our complex relationship with things.